![]() ![]() Those who abuse our hospitality and our charity must be returned to their country of origin.Īdditional resource should also be directed towards far shrewder evaluation of the claims presented. Certainly, criminal behaviour in the period between arrival and decision should be disqualifying outside the most exceptional circumstances. It should not be the case that unsuccessful appeal can follow unsuccessful appeal until the applicant and their lawyers finally hit upon a winning formulation.įar greater care should be taken to preserve the safety of the British population. The present process of interminable appeals must be replaced with a streamlined process. The answer must be to significantly increase the capacity of the asylum system, with cases heard and dealt with swiftly.Īpplicants should be assessed as they arrive, with their claims judged on those circumstances. Such calls are well-meaning but fundamentally misguided they would only increase the migration pull-factor. The appeals process would be less onerous if people did not spend extended periods in Britain generating potential fresh grounds for claims.ĭealing with this backlog does not require a general amnesty, or giving asylum seekers the right to work. The bill for asylum hotels would be greatly reduced if fewer people were left idly awaiting a decision. It is also at the root of many other flaws. This is undesirable both for the individual applicant, and for the British taxpayer, who pays to feed and house them while they wait. There are still nearly 100,000 cases awaiting a decision, with people left in limbo for long stretches while their fates are decided. While the Government has made much of clearing the “legacy backlog”, this referred only to applications made before June 2022. Of all its manifold failures, perhaps the most striking and fundamental is the length of time it takes for an asylum seeker to exit the system. It does not serve the interests of the British taxpayer, who find themselves paying for the board and lodging of tens of thousands of illegal arrivals while cases drag on through the tribunal system, or those of genuine asylum seekers, who are left in limbo. He is now wanted on suspicion of attacking a woman and her children with a chemical substance. Instead, he was granted leave to remain in 2021 or 2022, after claiming to have converted to Christianity. He claimed that if he returned to Afghanistan his life would be endangered, lodged two unsuccessful asylum claims, and in 2018 was convicted of a sex offence at Newcastle Crown Court.Īt this point, it would be reasonable to believe that Ezedi would have been removed from Britain. Nowhere is this clearer than in the case of the Clapham attack suspect Abdul Shokoor Ezedi.Įzidi arrived in this country illegally in 2016, concealed in the back of a lorry. It is increasingly obvious, however, that something has gone badly wrong. This record, and our asylum system, should be something we take pride in. Britain has a long and noble history of offering shelter and sanctuary to the genuinely persecuted. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |